Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 91, 2024 03 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515193

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be classified into sub-phenotypes according to different inflammatory/clinical status. Prognostic enrichment was achieved by grouping patients into hypoinflammatory or hyperinflammatory sub-phenotypes, even though the time of analysis may change the classification according to treatment response or disease evolution. We aimed to evaluate when patients can be clustered in more than 1 group, and how they may change the clustering of patients using data of baseline or day 3, and the prognosis of patients according to their evolution by changing or not the cluster. METHODS: Multicenter, observational prospective, and retrospective study of patients admitted due to ARDS related to COVID-19 infection in Spain. Patients were grouped according to a clustering mixed-type data algorithm (k-prototypes) using continuous and categorical readily available variables at baseline and day 3. RESULTS: Of 6205 patients, 3743 (60%) were included in the study. According to silhouette analysis, patients were grouped in two clusters. At baseline, 1402 (37%) patients were included in cluster 1 and 2341(63%) in cluster 2. On day 3, 1557(42%) patients were included in cluster 1 and 2086 (57%) in cluster 2. The patients included in cluster 2 were older and more frequently hypertensive and had a higher prevalence of shock, organ dysfunction, inflammatory biomarkers, and worst respiratory indexes at both time points. The 90-day mortality was higher in cluster 2 at both clustering processes (43.8% [n = 1025] versus 27.3% [n = 383] at baseline, and 49% [n = 1023] versus 20.6% [n = 321] on day 3). Four hundred and fifty-eight (33%) patients clustered in the first group were clustered in the second group on day 3. In contrast, 638 (27%) patients clustered in the second group were clustered in the first group on day 3. CONCLUSIONS: During the first days, patients can be clustered into two groups and the process of clustering patients may change as they continue to evolve. This means that despite a vast majority of patients remaining in the same cluster, a minority reaching 33% of patients analyzed may be re-categorized into different clusters based on their progress. Such changes can significantly impact their prognosis.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Humanos , Análise por Conglomerados , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Med Intensiva ; 33(5): 243-50, 2009.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19624999

RESUMO

Static pressure-volume curves of the respiratory system from patients with acute lung injury have been extensively studied as a marker of aeration and recruitment phenomena and as a tool to set mechanical ventilation. The inflection points of these curves allow to identify both the pressures in which recruitment starts and finishes and those in which derecruitment starts. However, setting the ventilatory parameters based on these curves has some problems, derived from the fact that setting PEEP and plateau pressures in these patients must balance between the benefits of recruitment and the risks of overstretching caused by high pressures. It remains to be determined if new data derived from these curves are useful to optimize ventilatory settings or to predict the response of a patient to a change in the ventilatory settings.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Testes de Função Respiratória/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...